Latest News

Bona fide need urged by landlord for tenant eviction must be genuine, sincere, honest, natural

This case concerned a revision petition filed by a landlord against the order of the Additional Rent Controller, Delhi (“ARC”) dismissing his eviction petition citing bona fide requirement. The ARC had also granted leave to defend to the tenant.

The Ld. Single Judge of the Delhi High Court held –

18. Further, no doubt, as held in Shiv Sarup Gupta (supra) the landlord is the best judge of his needs, it has also been held therein that the need urged by the landlord must be genuine, sincere, honest, natural, and the like. In fact, as also held by the Hon’ble Supreme Court in Sarvate T. B. v. Nemichand [1966 MP LJ 26 (S.C.)] and Dattatraya Laxman Kamble v. Abdul Rasul Moulali Kotkunde [(1999) 4 SCC 1], should there arise any suspicion/ doubt in the mind of the Court as to the genuineness of the bona fide requirement urged by the landlord, the burden is upon the landlord to clear all such doubts. Clearly, the landlord herein has not been able to discharge the said burden.”.

The revision petition was dismissed holding that there were contradictions, non-filing of requisite documents by the landlord and no proper evidence led by the landlord to prove his case, citing Sarla Ahuja vs. United India Insurance Co. Ltd. [(1998) 8 SCC 119] and Abid-Ul-Islam vs. Inder Sain Dua [(2022) 6 SCC 30]. The Delhi High Court did not interfere with the findings of the ARC stating that in revisional jurisdiction, the scope is itself limited.

SH. SANKET BEHARI MITTAL v. SH. SUBHASH CHAND GUPTA, RC.REV. 589/2019, DELHI HIGH COURT – 09 JANUARY 2026.

CALL US 24/7

Need Professional Legal Advice?
Get an Appointment Today!

Navigating complex legal landscapes, we deliver clarity and results.
Transparency and efficiency are our priorities; positive outcomes, our goal.
We offer experienced counsel, careful drafting and customized solutions.

Contact Details

Follow Us

Newsletter

You have been successfully Subscribed! Ops! Something went wrong, please try again.
© 2025 ilaindia.com, All rights reserved.

International Law Affiliates (the “Firm” or “I.L.A.”*) furnishes information on this website in accordance with the Bar Council of India’s guidelines and the Advocates Act, 1961 that govern the practice and professional ethics of advocates in India. This website offers an overview of the Firm and its areas of practice. Online content is for information purposes only and not for advertising. Content featured on this website may not be construed as legal advice. I.L.A. reserves the right to update or edit website content, without prior notice.

By clicking on the “I Agree” button below, you acknowledge and accept that:

  • You have approached I.L.A. for information on the firm’s year of establishment, partners, advocates, affiliates, practice areas, working hours, office contact details, articles, photo gallery and/or other relevant materials/content that we may upload from time to time.
  • There has been no invitation or inducement whatsoever from the Firm, any of its partners, associates, employees, agents etc. to create an attorney-client relationship, or any other legal relationship, through this website.
  • You have read, understood and accepted the  ilaindia.com terms of use available here.

International Law Affiliates®Pasrich & Company® and I.L.A. Pasrich & Company® and the corresponding logos are registered trademarks. International Law Affiliates owns the copyright to the entire website, including the content, layout, formats, design and colour combinations.

All rights in this respect are reserved.

* “The Firm” also includes “I.L.A. Pasrich & Company”, “I.L.A. Pasrich & Co.” and “Pasrich & Company”.